[1]孙 毅,郭艳红.语义下行说：基于对象的隐喻认知研究新范式[J].浙江外国语学院学报,2022,(01):33-42.
　SUN Yi,GUO Yanhong.Semantic Descent Account: A New Object-based Cognitive Research Paradigm of Metaphor[J].,2022,(01):33-42.
点击复制

语义下行说：基于对象的隐喻认知研究新范式(/HTML)
分享到： 更多

《浙江外国语学院学报》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
期数:
2022年01期
页码:
33-42
栏目:
语言学及应用语言学
出版日期:
2022-06-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Semantic Descent Account: A New Object-based Cognitive Research Paradigm of Metaphor
作者:
孙 毅1; 郭艳红2
1.广东外语外贸大学 外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心，广东 广州 510420；2.浙江工商大学 外国语学院，浙江 杭州 310018
Author(s):
SUN Yi1; GUO Yanhong2
1.Center for Linguistics and Applied Linguistics Research, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Guangzhou 510420, China; 2.School of Foreign Languages, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
关键词:
隐喻; 语义下行; 对象; 限定
Keywords:
metaphor;  semantic descent;  object;  qualification
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
语义下行说为隐喻解读提供了新视角。本文在介绍和引述语义下行说的基础上，尝试探讨基于对象的隐喻认知研究新范式。根据语义下行说的核心要义，隐喻蕴含一种从语词到对象的转移，该对象承担谓词功能对所涉主体进行限定。这种对象式限定是一种参与语义建构的方式，有望取代概念隐喻、属性共享和相似性等传统范式，为调解不可协商的真值提供切实途径。
Abstract:
The Semantic Descent Account provides a new perspective for metaphor interpretation. On the basis of introducing and quoting the Semantic Descent Account, this paper discusses a new object-based cognitive research paradigm of metaphor. According to the gist meaning of the Semantic Descent Account, metaphor entails a transference from the word to the object which serves as a predicative function to qualify the subject in question. This object-style qualification is a path to participate in semantic construction, which is expected to replace the traditional interpretation paradigms like conceptual metaphor, attribute sharing and similarity, and provide a way to mediate the non-negotiable truth value.

相似文献/References:

[1]卢真金.高等教育多学科研究中的隐喻分析[J].浙江外国语学院学报,2010,(06):7.
　LU Zhenjin.An Analysis of Metaphors in the Interdisciplinary Research of Higher Education[J].,2010,(01):7.
[2]吴卫东.教育隐喻：一种认知与语言视角的诠释[J].浙江外国语学院学报,2010,(05):1.
　WU Weidong.Educational Metaphor: From the Cognitive and Linguistic Point of View[J].,2010,(01):1.
[3]应璎.大英博物馆阅览室与“书荫幽谷的居民"——— 《新格拉布街》中的作家生存危机[J].浙江外国语学院学报,2012,(01):45.
　YING Ying.The British Museum Reading-room and “ Dwellers in the Valley of the shadow of Books”: The Crisis of Writers’ Survival in New Grub Street[J].,2012,(01):45.
[4]陈映戎.汉英隐喻中的植物文化意象对比[J].浙江外国语学院学报,2013,(02):51.
　CHEN Yingrong.Contrastive Studies on Cultural Images of Flora in Chinese and English Metaphors[J].,2013,(01):51.
[5]范振强.语义三域的机制思考：隐喻还是转喻？[J].浙江外国语学院学报,2014,(01):20.
[6]关冰冰,杨炳菁.《且听风吟》中的电冰箱[J].浙江外国语学院学报,2019,(03):100.
　GUAN Bingbing,YANG Bingjing.Refrigerators in Hear the Wind Sing[J].,2019,(01):100.
[7]徐盛桓.隐喻解读的非线性转换——分形论视域下隐喻研究之三[J].浙江外国语学院学报,2019,(05):1.
　XU Shenghuan.Nonlinear Transformation for Metaphorical Interpretation:?A Study of Metaphor from the Perspective of Fractal Theory[J].,2019,(01):1.
[8]潘艳艳.多模态认知批评视阈下的中美征兵平面广告对比研究[J].浙江外国语学院学报,2020,(01):61.
　PAN Yanyan.A Comparative Study of Recruitment Advertisements Between China and the United States from the Perspective of Multimodal Cognitive Critical Analysis[J].,2020,(01):61.
[9]胡壮麟.系统功能语言学视野中的体认语言学[J].浙江外国语学院学报,2021,(01):1.
　HU Zhuanglin.An Examination of ECL in the Perspective of SFL[J].,2021,(01):1.
[10]王　寅.翻译隐喻观的体认分析[J].浙江外国语学院学报,2021,(01):8.
　WANG Yin.The Embodied-Cognitive Analysis of Metaphorical Views on Translation[J].,2021,(01):8.

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-06-28