[1]刘意青.如何看待人生的善与恶——对梅尔维尔和霍桑的比较探讨[J].浙江外国语学院学报,2020,(03):1-10.
 LIU Yiqing.How to View Good and Evil of Life: A Comparative Study of Melville and Hawthorne[J].,2020,(03):1-10.
点击复制

如何看待人生的善与恶——对梅尔维尔和霍桑的比较探讨(/HTML)
分享到: 更多

《浙江外国语学院学报》[ISSN:/CN:]

卷:
期数:
2020年03期
页码:
1-10
栏目:
特稿
出版日期:
2020-10-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
How to View Good and Evil of Life: A Comparative Study of Melville and Hawthorne
作者:
刘意青
(北京大学 外国语学院,北京 100871)
Author(s):
LIU Yiqing
(School of Foreign Languages, Peking University, Beijing 100871,China)
关键词:
梅尔维尔霍桑善与恶象征含糊叙事
Keywords:
Melville Hawthorne good and evil symbol ambiguity
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
文章基于文本细读探讨了关注善与恶互斥互补关系的重要作家梅尔维尔和霍桑的贡献,试图揭示这两位作家如何通过象征和含糊叙事的艺术手法创作深刻批判清教原罪和宿命论危害的作品。他们创作的那些看似悲观和阴暗的传奇故事实际上以自己的方式呼应了以爱默生为代表的超验主义为振兴美国所做的努力。他们以象征和含糊叙事的艺术手法为作品获取多元理解提供了可能,前瞻了20世纪兴起的多元文学和文化阐释运动。
Abstract:
Based on close-reading of the texts, this essay discusses the 19th-century American writers Melville and Hawthorne, whose concern is centered on the problems of good and evil. The essay aims at exploring how they expose in depth in their works the harm done to Puritan believers by the Calvinistic religious doctrines of the original sin and the predestination. Their seemingly pessimistic and dark legends in fact function as a positive response in their own way to Emerson’s optimistic transcendental effort to urge America forward. Moreover, the two authors’ choice of using symbols and ambiguity in the narrative supplies a multi-interpretation possibility of their stories, and anticipates the rise of cultural and literary pluralism movement in the 20th century.
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-11-09